<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Business on OpTe.ch</title><link>https://www.opte.ch/tags/business/</link><description>Recent content in Business on OpTe.ch</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><copyright>&amp;copy; Mike Oertli</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 08:15:42 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.opte.ch/tags/business/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Evaluating If and How Apple's Strategy is Still Like a Startup</title><link>https://www.opte.ch/news/evaluating-if-and-how-apples-strategy-is-like-a-startup/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 07:42:35 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://www.opte.ch/news/evaluating-if-and-how-apples-strategy-is-like-a-startup/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Apple has famously &lt;a href="http://www.folklore.org/StoryView.py?story=Pirate_Flag.txt" target="_blank"&gt;flown a pirate flag&lt;/a&gt;, dismissed &lt;a href="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2013/12/28/apple-cook-icahn-proxy/" target="_blank"&gt;conventional business practices&lt;/a&gt;, and run the company in &lt;a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2011/08/29/jobs-made-apple-great-by-ignoring-profit/" target="_blank"&gt;nontraditional ways&lt;/a&gt;. It seems to be working so far. This isn&amp;rsquo;t an argument that Apple is &lt;em&gt;exactly&lt;/em&gt; like a startup, but there are some key indicators that highlight how Apple is run differently when compared to any other multibillion dollar technology company such as Google, IBM, or Microsoft.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="the-475b-startupish" class="relative group"&gt;The $475B Startup(ish) &lt;span class="absolute top-0 w-6 transition-opacity opacity-0 -start-6 not-prose group-hover:opacity-100"&gt;&lt;a class="group-hover:text-primary-300 dark:group-hover:text-neutral-700" style="text-decoration-line: none !important;" href="#the-475b-startupish" aria-label="Anchor"&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;h3 id="focus" class="relative group"&gt;Focus &lt;span class="absolute top-0 w-6 transition-opacity opacity-0 -start-6 not-prose group-hover:opacity-100"&gt;&lt;a class="group-hover:text-primary-300 dark:group-hover:text-neutral-700" style="text-decoration-line: none !important;" href="#focus" aria-label="Anchor"&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;The number of technology product categories that Apple participates in in shockingly small for a company that size. It could be argued that Apple&amp;rsquo;s focus on their products has never been better. Their newer products are selling in &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/28/technology/apple-reports-record-iphone-sales.html?_r=0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"&gt;record numbers&lt;/a&gt; with their older products &lt;a href="http://appleinsider.com/articles/14/01/09/apples-domestic-mac-sales-surge-285-as-overall-pc-market-shrinks-75" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"&gt;outpacing&lt;/a&gt; their respective industries. This focus is far more aligned with a startup mentality - &amp;ldquo;If we can just do this &lt;em&gt;one&lt;/em&gt; thing perfectly&amp;hellip;&amp;rdquo; The focus is very apparent, even to a fault in some cases.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>