<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>CES on OpTe.ch</title><link>https://www.opte.ch/tags/ces/</link><description>Recent content in CES on OpTe.ch</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><copyright>&amp;copy; Mike Oertli</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jan 2014 11:03:38 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.opte.ch/tags/ces/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Tech Bloggers Giving CES the Apple Treatment</title><link>https://www.opte.ch/news/tech-bloggers-giving-ces-the-apple-treatment/</link><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jan 2014 10:48:46 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://www.opte.ch/news/tech-bloggers-giving-ces-the-apple-treatment/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2014/01/the-end-of-ces/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; by Mat Honan from Wired, he highlights a major problem with technology journalism today - people are bored with just about everything. These are just TVs, this is just another tablet, that iPhone is hardly any different from the last one&amp;hellip; blah blah blah.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This year the CES coverage seemed to be more pessimistic than previous years. The latest iPhone release seemed to be received as more disappointing than previous years. The anti-Apple folks say that Apple has peaked and can&amp;rsquo;t keep up their momentum without Steve Jobs. The rest of the tech bloggers think that CES has lost its shine. These aren&amp;rsquo;t two separate things, there is one explanation - everyone has gotten used to &lt;em&gt;insanely&lt;/em&gt; brilliant, beautiful, and incredible technology. Many believe it is bland and boring because we&amp;rsquo;re surrounded by it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Engadget: CES 2014 Picks</title><link>https://www.opte.ch/news/engadget-ces-2014-picks/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:35:55 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://www.opte.ch/news/engadget-ces-2014-picks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Some interesting picks in here, definitely seems to capture the best products there. With that being said, I&amp;rsquo;m still not seeing anything that is standing out.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Oculus Rift keeps making these kinds of lists, but it seems to be in a perpetual state of development.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Sony Z1 Compact packs a top end punch into an iPhone-size device, a rarity for Android devices.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;There are a LOT of fitness trackers, I don&amp;rsquo;t see that changing any time soon.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The Mother sensor system seems interesting. Not a grand slam, but a fresh take on smart home technology.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description></item><item><title>CES 2014: 4K and 3D</title><link>https://www.opte.ch/news/ces-2014-4k-and-3d/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 08:18:24 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://www.opte.ch/news/ces-2014-4k-and-3d/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There has been a &lt;a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=ces+2014+4k&amp;amp;oq=ces+2014+4k" target="_blank"&gt;lot of 4K news at CES&lt;/a&gt;, no surprise there. Computer monitors make sense and a 4K computer monitor should excite anyone who uses desktop monitors. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TVs are a different story. When talking TVs, the important thing to remember is that you don&amp;rsquo;t sit nearly as close to them. When you sit farther back, even the most perfect human eye can only differentiate a certain level of detail. &lt;a href="http://carltonbale.com/1080p-does-matter/" target="_blank"&gt;Read more here&lt;/a&gt;. Here&amp;rsquo;s the quick version; this diagram shows you the screen size versus viewing distance chart and shows at which range a given resolution is actually valuable.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How Much Does Design Matter for Wearable Tech?</title><link>https://www.opte.ch/news/how-much-does-design-matter-for-wearable-tech/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 08:11:00 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://www.opte.ch/news/how-much-does-design-matter-for-wearable-tech/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;John Gruber posted an interesting tweet yesterday regarding how important the aesthetic design of a product is:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We’ve always judged cell phones by how they look, and we keep them in our pockets. Wearables — glasses, watches, anything — can’t be ugly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— John Gruber (@gruber) &lt;a href="https://twitter.com/gruber/statuses/420330000945274880" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"&gt;January 6, 2014&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course, some folks aren&amp;rsquo;t interested in the design of a product, but in general it holds true. Some of the appeal of the iPhone is how stunning it is to look at. Part of the appeal of the Moto X is how clean and simple the design is while still being highly customizable.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>