<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Connected Home on OpTe.ch</title><link>https://www.opte.ch/tags/connected-home/</link><description>Recent content in Connected Home on OpTe.ch</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><copyright>&amp;copy; Mike Oertli</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 08:09:23 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.opte.ch/tags/connected-home/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Apple's Rumored Home Automation Solution is Already in Most Homes</title><link>https://www.opte.ch/news/apples-rumored-home-automation-solution-is-already-in-most-homes/</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 08:09:23 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://www.opte.ch/news/apples-rumored-home-automation-solution-is-already-in-most-homes/</guid><description>\[Note: Sorry for the duplicate post, I really didn't like that first title.\]&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/1bef71b8-e433-11e3-a73a-00144feabdc0.html?siteedition=intl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"&gt;News broke&lt;/a&gt; (subscription required) over the holiday weekend that Apple is rumored to announce a home automation solution and/or platform at WWDC this year. Of course, rumors like this are to be taken with a grain of salt, but John Gruber&amp;rsquo;s reply of &amp;ldquo;I’m pretty excited for next week.&amp;rdquo; is classic Gruber-speak (albeit not a sure thing) for &amp;ldquo;this is happening.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Apple's Rumored Home Automation Solution is Already In Most Homes</title><link>https://www.opte.ch/news/why-apples-rumored-home-automation-announcement-at-wwdc-is-different/</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 07:54:42 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://www.opte.ch/news/why-apples-rumored-home-automation-announcement-at-wwdc-is-different/</guid><description>\[Update: Changed title to better reflect the article. Will re-post with new link, but keep this link active.\]&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/1bef71b8-e433-11e3-a73a-00144feabdc0.html?siteedition=intl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"&gt;News broke&lt;/a&gt; (subscription required) over the holiday weekend that Apple is rumored to announce a home automation solution and/or platform at WWDC this year. Of course, rumors like this are to be taken with a grain of salt, but John Gruber&amp;rsquo;s reply of &amp;ldquo;I’m pretty excited for next week.&amp;rdquo; is classic Gruber-speak (albeit not a sure thing) for &amp;ldquo;this is happening.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Trouble With the Internet of Things</title><link>https://www.opte.ch/news/the-trouble-with-the-internet-of-things/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 07:32:21 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://www.opte.ch/news/the-trouble-with-the-internet-of-things/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The Internet of Things (IoT) is the fascinating and (potentially) fast-approaching addition of Internet connectivity to just about everything. From your blinds opening for you as you get out of bed to your fridge telling you you&amp;rsquo;re low on milk. The Nest thermostat is one of the first highly successful IoT devices and it has shown how great the potential is in this space.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So what&amp;rsquo;s the trouble?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In short: data and money, but let&amp;rsquo;s break that down.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Follow-Up On Pragmatic's Automation Discussion</title><link>https://www.opte.ch/news/follow-up-on-pragmatics-automation-discussion/</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:05:37 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://www.opte.ch/news/follow-up-on-pragmatics-automation-discussion/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.fiatlux.fm/pragmatic/3" target="_blank"&gt;Pragmatic Show Episode 3&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion on automation in the latest episode of Pragmatic was a great one. It touched on a lot of key value to be had in the smart home endeavor. Below are a few points from the show and my corresponding thoughts that should serve more as logical extensions rather than contradictions, though I do not speak on their behalf:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Pragmatic&lt;/strong&gt;: The true value is in automation, remote control is secondary.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mike&lt;/strong&gt;: Largely I agree, 2 main considerations.
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The automation side is surprisingly underdeveloped right now. Companies like &lt;a href="http://www.smartthings.com" target="_blank"&gt;Smart Things&lt;/a&gt; are making progress, but the fact remains that the market isn&amp;rsquo;t there yet. Automated lights will still turn off if you&amp;rsquo;re still watching TV or reading, automated blinds will open when you get out of the shower before you&amp;rsquo;re dressed, and motion sensors get tripped up by passing objects or glares that you don&amp;rsquo;t want sensed. Once this stuff is perfected, it&amp;rsquo;ll take off a lot faster. The user experience is currently unacceptable for anyone besides early adopters and nerds.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Remote control doesn&amp;rsquo;t have nearly as frequent of a use case in general, of course there are exceptions. However, a fair number of the use cases are arguably of higher importance. Consider forgetting to close your garage door when you leave for work - you never remember if you closed it or not so you either gamble, or turn back. The value in remote &amp;ldquo;control&amp;rdquo; is arguably more in the remote &lt;em&gt;monitoring&lt;/em&gt; then being able to react. To merge these 2 points, you&amp;rsquo;d love to see automation take over here and sense that no one is home, none of the occupants&amp;rsquo; phones are detected to be inside the home, therefore the home takes action - locks doors, closes the garage door, adjusts the heat, lights off (except at sunset when the outdoor lights turn on), etc. I could discuss this at length, we&amp;rsquo;ll leave it here for now.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Pragmatic&lt;/strong&gt;: There is an associated cost with spending your own time on installing, setting up, and maintaining a smart home. The &amp;ldquo;cost&amp;rdquo; and/or &amp;ldquo;savings&amp;rdquo; is not necessarily monetary and can be hard to measure.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mike&lt;/strong&gt;: There is a circular problem here. The setup cost and technical knowledge required prevents it from being mainstream, the fact that it isn&amp;rsquo;t mainstream prevents a lot of companies from investing in it, the lack of participation in the market prevents costs from dropping due to competition. I don&amp;rsquo;t believe that the disruption in this market has happened yet, and by definition, disruption is what breaks that cycle. The &lt;a href="https://nest.com" target="_blank"&gt;Nest&lt;/a&gt; Thermostat and Protect are the closest we&amp;rsquo;ve gotten to that and I think &lt;em&gt;the&lt;/em&gt; disruptive event is right around the corner. That being said, the iPhone of home automation hasn&amp;rsquo;t shown its pretty little face. Disclaimer: I own a Nest Thermostat and could not love it more. Nest Protect is very high on my list of things to be purchased as well.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There will be more thoughts on this in future posts. I find this market to be full of examples of people and products that have much better selling points and features on the box than they have practical applications in improving one&amp;rsquo;s life.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>