<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>iPhoto on OpTe.ch</title><link>https://www.opte.ch/tags/iphoto/</link><description>Recent content in iPhoto on OpTe.ch</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><copyright>&amp;copy; Mike Oertli</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 13:50:15 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.opte.ch/tags/iphoto/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Marco Arment on Apple's Increasingly Ignored Software Products</title><link>https://www.opte.ch/news/marco-arment-on-apples-increasingly-ignored-software-products/</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 13:42:56 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://www.opte.ch/news/marco-arment-on-apples-increasingly-ignored-software-products/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Apple is so close to knocking it out of the park with several of their software products, but I agree with Marco&amp;rsquo;s comments. iPhoto is a great example; it is the near the top of the list of reasons to own a Mac, but it isn&amp;rsquo;t perfect and hasn&amp;rsquo;t seen a meaningful update in a while. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple seems to be faced with an interesting dilemma - these software products seem like unfinished versions of how Apple envisions this type of product to look on their platform. They seem unfinished because they&amp;rsquo;re &amp;ldquo;good enough&amp;rdquo; (generally speaking) and don&amp;rsquo;t make headlines or money to warrant being any better. That&amp;rsquo;s acceptable from a lot of companies, but it is very un-Apple-like.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>