<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Screen size on OpTe.ch</title><link>https://www.opte.ch/tags/screen-size/</link><description>Recent content in Screen size on OpTe.ch</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><copyright>&amp;copy; Mike Oertli</copyright><lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:49:19 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.opte.ch/tags/screen-size/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Thoughts on Viticci's iPad Pro Scenarios</title><link>https://www.opte.ch/news/thoughts-on-viticcis-ipad-pro-scenarios/</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:25:38 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://www.opte.ch/news/thoughts-on-viticcis-ipad-pro-scenarios/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The discussion on &lt;a href="http://5by5.tv/prompt" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"&gt;The Prompt&lt;/a&gt; last week (episode 31) sparked a series of thoughts for me regarding whether or not Apple is even considering an iPad Pro (12.9&amp;quot;) and what exactly the device would be. Despite being an unlikely product for the near term, it is an interesting discussion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3 id="federico-gives-three-scenarios" class="relative group"&gt;Federico gives three scenarios: &lt;span class="absolute top-0 w-6 transition-opacity opacity-0 -start-6 not-prose group-hover:opacity-100"&gt;&lt;a class="group-hover:text-primary-300 dark:group-hover:text-neutral-700" style="text-decoration-line: none !important;" href="#federico-gives-three-scenarios" aria-label="Anchor"&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Just a larger iPad. Same iOS, same hardware features, larger (12.9&amp;quot;) screen.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;iPad Pro with substantial hardware and software feature changes.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Hybrid device, or &amp;ldquo;convertible&amp;rdquo; as Intel calls them.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let&amp;rsquo;s be clear here, Federico isn&amp;rsquo;t making the case for any of the three options, this is merely a game of &amp;ldquo;what if&amp;rdquo; that we&amp;rsquo;re playing. I think it is also important to preface this analysis with an immensely relevant comment from the podcast -&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>